Wednesday, November 29, 2006


Critics of the Bush administration often claim that the president is undermining science education by promoting the teaching of creationism. The "teach the controversy" mantra is attributed to the president as being a reflection of administration policy. Critics of the admintration's science policy should temper their critiques with the actual facts. On November 15 speaking at an American Association for the Advancement of Science Leadership Seminar Presidential science advisor and director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Dr. John Marburger was recently quoted as saying,

"No one is putting pressure on me or suggesting that creationism should be a part of science education—that's ridiculous," he said. "I've never heard this discussed in any—in any-of the meetings or forums or private discussions...that I've ever had with anybody in the White House [or federal agencies]." American Association for the Advancement of Science News Archives

The Bush administration may be guilty of some politcal pandering to the religous right but the fact is there is no absolutely no evidence that this posturing on creationism and intelligent design reflects actual policy. To the contrary, the administration, through officials like Marburger, have expressed complete support for the scientific consensus on evolution.


Unless the post above is followed by '-END' then CLICK HERE to read more!

Friday, September 22, 2006


It isn't often that an entirely new species of bird is discovered so when it does happen it is big news. Professional astronomer, amatuer ornithologist and dedicated conservationist Ramana Athreya of Pune University, Pune, India has discribed a new member of the genus Liocichla in the extreme western part of the Northern India state of Arunachal Pradesh. This bird was known from an area of Arunachal Pradesh called the Eaglenest Wildlife Sanctuary for quite some time but carefull study was needed to determine if this population truly represented a new species or not. The new bird, named the Bungun Liocichla (Liocichla bungunorum), after the name of the local indigenous people, is the fourth named species in it's genus. The three other liocichla species include the Red-faced Liocichla (Liocichla phoenicea, widely distributed in South and Southeast Asia), the Emei-shan Liocichla (Liocichla omeiensis, retricted to a few forested moutainsides in China) and Steere's Liocichla (Liocichla steerii, a species endemic to the mountains of Taiwan and the subject of much of my own research). All these species frequent dense undergrowth and edge habitats in mountain forests, except for the Red-faced Liocichla which can also be found in lowland forests.

Typically discovery of a new species involves collection of a type specimen to be deposited in a museum collection. This makes the relevent biological material accessable for scientists all over the world so they may examine the data for themselves. However, Dr. Athreya felt culling an indiviudal bird or two from the population was unwise owing to the unknown status of the population therefore the description of this new species was made on the basis of measurements and photographs taken from live birds captured in the field. The primary tool of the 19th century ornithologist was the shotgun rather than a pair of binoculars. But, many modern ornithologists are more sensitive to environmental concerns and considerably more squeamish about killing birds (although there to date is little evidence that scientific collecting has had any long term harm on avian populations). Fortunately however the shotgun need not be necessary in every case. Modern comparative genetic analyses, such as DNA barcoding, is extremely useful in identifying relationships among species and DNA can be archived in museum freezers and sequences placed on online databases so that they can be available to other researchers. Tissue from feathers lost from the birds during capture could well provide a source of DNA that could further confirm the species status of this find.

I have a personal interest in this story as an ornithologist whose research deals with the Taiwan species of Liocichla, Steere's Liocichla. Dr. Athreya contacted several professional ornithologists, including myself, about a year ago asking for our input and advice on this species. There was a lively discussion at the time through the Oriental Bird Club's discussion list over the issue of scientific collecting. In the end however Dr. Athreya did the right thing for now in deciding not to collect museum specimens until further information became available about this species' status. The existing description of this species in the end made excellent use of limited information and luckily this species was so very different from it's congeners that even on the basis of some photographs and morphological measurments there is a strong case to be made for species status for this population. However, the genetic work should still be done. I would have loved to obtain some blood samples or other sources of genetic material from this species for analysis in my lab, however, this population is in a highly protected area and the Indian government is extremely sensitive and cautious when it comes to sharing biological samples with foreign researchers so in the end this was unfortunately not possible. But, there are many labs these days in India equiped to do such work (of course as long as they can depend on the good will of other countries to share samples with Indian researchers). It sounds like there is much exciting work ahead not just on this new species but on this unique forest ecosystem in Arunachal Pradesh. One can only hope that the forest habitat of the Eaglenest Wildlife Sanctuary can be subject to sound mangement practices.

Press coverage of this discovery can be found at BirdLife International, MSNBC and the BBC News. The description of this new species was published in the journal Indian Birds and is available online.


Unless the post above is followed by '-END' then CLICK HERE to read more!

Friday, September 15, 2006


That's me holding a young Chinese Pangolin (Manus pentadactyla) during a visit to the Taiwan Endemic Species Research Institute. Pangolins are mammals in the order Pholidota and there are eight extant species distributed throughout Africa and South Asia. Their bodies are covered with keratinized scales and when threatened they roll into a ball. In fact, the name pangolin is from a Malay word which means "something that rolls up". Heavy rains often means bad news for burrowing animals and this individual and his mother and sibling were flooded out of their home during a particularly long bout of heavy rains in Taiwan during 2006. The wildlife hospital at the Endemic Species Institute takes in cases like this and rehabilitates them for later release back into the wild.


Unless the post above is followed by '-END' then CLICK HERE to read more!